Benutzerspezifische Werkzeuge
Amnesty Urgent Actions
Startseite Urgent Actions 2022 04 Protect access to abortion
UA 032/22
Puerto Rico (USA)
Aktiv seit 18. April 2022 | Noch 7 Tage Laufzeit

Protect access to abortion

AI-Index: AMR 47/5480/2022

A recently published bill seeks to prohibit abortions after 22 weeks, or when a doctor determines that the foetus is viable, with the only exception being if the pregnant person’s life is in danger. According to international law, any restrictions on access to abortion must be human rights compliant. We call for urgent objective public hearings and meaningful human rights scrutiny of this bill.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

In 1973 the US Supreme Court ruled that abortion was legal in the landmark case Roe v. Wade. In Puerto Rico, there are currently limited legal restrictions on access to abortion, which can take place at any stage in the pregnancy when carried out by a doctor to conserve the life or the health, including mental health, of the pregnant person.

However, a recently published bill would restrict access to abortion after 22 weeks, or when a doctor determines that the foetus is viable, with the only exception being if the pregnant person’s life is in danger.

This new bill has been proposed in the context of an onslaught of legal challenges by anti-choice groups in the USA which seek to restrict access to abortion. In 2021 alone, more than 100 abortion restrictions were implemented across the USA, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

Puerto Rico’s Department of Health and Department of Justice have both expressed concerns with the new bill, which among other things, calls for the creation of a government registry of data of people who terminate pregnancies within the period in which the foetus is considered viable, the justification for it, as well as details of the medical professional who practices the abortion, which could undermine the right to privacy and confidentiality of people who choose to opt for an abortion or expose them or medical professionals to sanctions or stigmatization.

Public health and social science research have demonstrated that time-bound regulation of abortion – or setting «gestational limits» - may constitute an arbitrary and discriminatory barrier to accessing services, which has a disproportionate impact on the human rights of women and girls. The negative impact of gestational limits on access to quality public health care has been recognized by the WHO.

For gestational limits to be human rights compliant they must respect and protect the human rights of women and girls and all others who can become pregnant, including their rights to life, health and to bodily integrity and reproductive autonomy.

Gestational limits can deny people who need abortions access to services, disproportionately impacting those from poorer and/or marginalized backgrounds. Health professionals can also be arbitrarily precluded from considering all medical and clinical options with the best interest of their patient in view and there is a tendency to over apply the legal requirement of gestational limits due to the chilling effect they can have.

People who access abortions in the USA are disproportionally poor and low income. However, abortions in later pregnancy are quite rare. In the USA, for example, most abortions take place early in pregnancy. In the USA in 2016, only 1.3% of abortions occurred after 21 weeks. Similarly, in Puerto Rico, according to a submission by the Department of Health, the majority of abortions in Puerto Rico take place before 14 weeks.

Despite this, there are important reasons why some people will need abortions later in pregnancy, such as(1) when the pregnancy poses a risk to health of the pregnant person, (2) where there is a foetal impairment diagnosis, (3) where the pregnancy is the result of incest and/or sexual violence, (4) where the woman or girl was unaware of the pregnancy, or (5) had limited access sexual reproductive healthcare and/or abortion services, or(6) if the pregnant person was in a situation of domestic violence or had been trafficked and where their liberty or freedom of movement was restricted.

Puerto Rico’s Department of Health in a submission made on 17 March 2022 related to the bill, raised a series of other situations in which a woman might need to access an abortion later in pregnancy, including if her body is still under development and if she has never experienced a pregnancy before and has no understanding of how it feels, or if she is in pre-menopause and no longer expecting to be able to get pregnant.

International human rights law and standards require states to ensure access to safe and legal abortion to protect women’s and girls’ life and health at all stages of pregnancy without discrimination. The Human Rights Council in its General Comment 36 on the Right to Life has prohibited states from regulating abortion in a manner that runs contrary to their duty to ensure that women and girls do not have to undertake unsafe abortions.

Take action

  • Write an appeal in your own words or use the model letter below.

  • Take action on Social media: Infos see the yellow field on the right.

  • Please take action before 24 May 2022.

  • Preferred language: Spanish, English. You can also write in your own language.

Model letter

→ Model letter in spanish see below


Honorable Rodríguez Veve,

Currently in Puerto Rico, there are few legal restrictions on access to abortion, which can take place at any stage in the pregnancy when carried out by a doctor to conserve the life or the health, including mental health, of the pregnant person.

However, a recently published bill would restrict access to abortion after 22 weeks, or when a doctor determines that the foetus is viable, with the only exception being if the pregnant persons’ life is in danger. It would not permit a termination after 22 weeks for other reasons, such as where there is a diagnosis of foetal impairment, where the pregnancy is the result of incest and/or sexual violence, or where the pregnant person was unaware of the pregnancy or had limited access to sexual and reproductive healthcare and/or abortion services.

Restrictions on access to abortion would constitute a retrogression in rights and a barrier to accessing public health services, which risks having a disproportionate impact on women and pregnant people in serious situations - such as those who need abortions for medical reasons to safeguard their health, or who have experienced sexual violence or trafficking and who were unable to access abortion earlier - as well as those who are already historically marginalized and for whom access to abortion may be more difficult, for example, due to lack of financial resources.

We write to you, urging you to take a stand against any regression in the human rights protection of women, girls and all others who can become pregnant. A first step towards this is to ensure that any public hearings that take place regarding Bill #693 are objective, meaning that all interventions from a diversity of stakeholders are equally heard, and subject to meaningful human rights scrutiny. This would help to ensure a suitable process is in place, and avoid potentially grave negative impacts on the rights to life, health, and privacy of girls and women and all others who can become pregnant.

International human rights law and standards require states to ensure access to safe and legal abortion to protect women’s and girls’ life and health at all stages of pregnancy without discrimination. The Human Rights Council in its General Comment 36 on the Right to Life has prohibited states from regulating abortion in a manner that runs contrary to their duty to ensure that women and girls do not have to undertake unsafe abortions. As such, people’s ability to make decisions about one’s body, sexuality and reproduction is at the core of gender, economic and social justice, and states must not legislate with the aim to remove any human rights, including sexual and reproductive rights.

Yours sincerely,


Model letter in spanish open here / Aqui modelo de carta en español

Honorable Joanne Rodríguez Veve:
En la actualidad, en Puerto Rico, hay pocas restricciones legales al acceso al aborto, que puede llevarse a cabo en cualquier etapa del embarazo cuando un médico lo practica para conservar la vida o la salud, incluida la salud mental, de la persona embarazada.
Sin embargo, un proyecto de ley recientemente publicado restringiría el acceso al aborto después de las 22 semanas, o cuando un médico determine que el feto es viable, con la única excepción de si la vida de la persona embarazada corre peligro. Este proyecto de ley no permitiría la interrupción del embarazo después de las 22 semanas por otros motivos, como cuando exista un diagnóstico de malformación del feto, cuando el embarazo sea consecuencia de incesto y/o violencia sexual, o cuando la persona embarazada no fuera consciente del embarazo o tuviera acceso limitado a atención de la salud sexual y reproductiva y/o servicios de aborto.
Las restricciones del acceso al aborto constituirían un paso atrás en cuanto a los derechos y un obstáculo para acceder a servicios de salud pública, y amenazan con tener un efecto desproporcionado en las mujeres y las personas embarazadas en situaciones graves —por ejemplo, las que necesitan un aborto por motivos médicos para proteger su salud, o las que han sufrido violencia sexual o trata de personas y no han podido acceder al aborto antes—, así como en aquellas que ya sufren una marginación histórica y para quienes el acceso al aborto puede resultar más difícil, por ejemplo por falta de recursos económicos.
Nos dirigimos a usted para instarla a pronunciarse contra todo retroceso en la protección de los derechos humanos de las mujeres, las niñas y todas las demás personas que puedan quedarse embarazadas. Una primera medida a este respecto es garantizar que todas las vistas públicas que se celebren sobre el proyecto de ley 693 son objetivas (lo cual quiere decir que se escuchan por igual todas las intervenciones de una diversidad de partes interesadas), y están sometidas a un escrutinio significativo en materia de derechos humanos. Esto ayudaría a garantizar que existe un proceso adecuado, y a evitar consecuencias negativas potencialmente graves para los derechos a la vida, a la salud y a la intimidad de niñas, mujeres y todas las demás personas que puedan quedarse embarazadas.
El derecho y las normas internacionales de derechos humanos exigen que los Estados garanticen el acceso al aborto sin riesgos y legal para proteger la vida y la salud de las mujeres y las niñas en todas las etapas del embarazo, sin discriminación. El Consejo de Derechos Humanos, en su Observación general 36 sobre el derecho a la vida, ha prohibido a los Estados que regulen el aborto de manera contraria a su deber de velar por que las mujeres y las niñas no tengan que recurrir a abortos peligrosos. Así, la capacidad de las personas de tomar decisiones sobre su cuerpo, su sexualidad y su reproducción yace en el núcleo de la justicia económica, social y de género, y los Estados no deben legislar con el objetivo de eliminar derechos humanos de ningún tipo, incluidos los derechos sexuales y reproductivos.
Atentamente,

 

 


Appeals to

→ Given the urgency of the situation we request to send e-mails and target the authority via Twitter.

Hon. Joanne Rodríguez Veve
President of the Commission of Life and Family Affairs
Senate of Puerto Rico
Senado- El Capitolio
San Juan
Puerto Rico 00902-3431

E-mails: joarodriguez@senado.pr.gov AND info@joannerodriguezveve.com AND emartinez@senado.pr.gov
Twitter: @rodriguez_veve

 

Copies to

Botschaft der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika
Sulgeneckstrasse 19
3007 Bern

Fax: 031 357 73 20
E-Mail: bernpa@state.gov ; bern-protocol@state.gov

 

 

→ Letter delivery to other countries - General info:
It is possible to send PRIORITY letters to almost all countries.
Please check
on the Website of the Swiss Post, whether letters are currently being delivered to the destination country.
If not, we ask you to use other communication channels (email, fax or social media, if available) for the delivery of your appeal and/or send it via the embassy with the request for forwarding to the named person.

Social media guide

Use Twitter to go public with the messaging of the template provided in this Urgent Action.

You can also use this suggested copy for the social messages to targets:

Puerto Rico faces a historical moment. @JoseLuisDalmau and @rodriguez_veve: stand on the right side of history and call for just, objective and plural public hearings of #PS693. The world is watching!

 

You can also target Senator Joanne Rodríguez Veve on other social media channels they are active:

Facebook:
@JoanneRodriguezVeve

Instagram:
@joanne_rodriguez_veve

7 Briefe verschickt  
My Urgent Actions
Fürs Mitzählen lassen Ihres Briefes und Update-Funktion zu nutzen müssen Sie sich
einloggen oder
anmelden
Downloads
UA 032/22 english
Microsoft Word Document, 41.3 kB
UA 032/22 espagnol
Microsoft Word Document, 81.9 kB
UA 032/22 deutsch
Microsoft Word Document, 43.7 kB