Benutzerspezifische Werkzeuge
Amnesty Urgent Actions
Startseite Urgent Actions 2018 09 Papuan activist charged for posting Facebook-video
UA 165/18
Indonesia
Abgeschlossen am 19. Oktober 2018

Papuan activist charged for posting Facebook-video

AI-Index: ASA 21/9048/2018

A peaceful pro-independence Papuan activist, Agustinus Yolemal, was detained and charged for posting a video on Facebook. He was charged with «disseminating hostility against the state ideology» under the Law on Electronic Information and Transaction. If convicted, he would face a penalty of up to six years’ imprisonment. He is a prisoner of conscience and should be immediately and unconditionally released.

On the evening of 23 August, Agustinus Yolemal, a Papuan pro-independence activist, was in his house in Timika, Mimika District, Papua Province with his wife, his 6-year-old son and his sister-in-law. Dozens of police personnel arrested Agustinus, without showing an arrest warrant, the police brought all four people to a local police station for interrogation. The police also interrogated the 6-year old boy. After hours of interrogation, the police released three of them, while detaining Agustinus. The police named Agustinus as a suspect for disseminating video containing «hostile messages against Indonesia’s state ideology.» In the video that Agustinus posted on his Facebook page a few months ago, both Agustinus and his son can be seen and heard jointly voicing slogans including «Papua, independence», «referendum, yes», «Indonesia, go home», «Indonesia, stupid» and «Indonesia, animal». At the end of the video, Agustinus said that some of the slogans were too «evil» and told his son not to repeat them.

Article 45A(2) of Law on Electronic Information and Transaction (ITE Law), under which Agustinus has been charged, carries a maximum sentence of six years’ imprisonment and/or a fine of up to one billion rupiah (around US$66,700) for «[a]ny person who deliberately and without right disseminates information aimed at inflicting hatred or hostility on individuals and/or certain groups in the society based on ethnicity, religion, race and membership of inter-groups (antar-golongan) as provided in Article 28(2) of the ITE Law.» Although these articles of the ITE Law speak of information «aimed at inflicting hatred or hostility» on individuals and groups, in practice it has been used to prosecute individuals who use social media or other online platforms to criticise or ridicule abstract entities such as religion or «state ideology». Thus, the vague and overbroad legislation has often been used to arrest, prosecute and punish persons for peacefully exercising their freedom of speech.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Indonesia enshrines guarantees to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly in its Constitution and other national legislation. But legislation continues to be used to criminalize peaceful political activities and to imprison people solely for the peaceful exercise of their rights to freedom of expression and opinion, peaceful assembly and thought, conscience and religion.
International human rights law requires states to prohibit advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, as provided in Article 20(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Indonesia is a state party. The prohibition relates to incitement against persons belonging to particular groups, including religious groups; it does not cover criticism or even insults to abstract entities such as religion, opinions or state ideology. In order to comply with the ICCPR, any such prohibition must be precisely formulated to cover only forms of expression which contain both the element of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred and the element of incitement against the people concerned; moreover, such acts may only be criminally prosecuted if there is evidence of intent with regard to both elements.
Amnesty International has repeatedly called on the Indonesian authorities to repeal or amend Article 28(2) of the ITE Law to bring it into line with Indonesia’s obligations under international law and ensure that it is not used to violate the right to freedom of expression.
Amnesty International takes no position whatsoever on the political status of any province of Indonesia, including calls for independence. However, the organization believes that the right to freedom of expression includes the right to peacefully advocate referendums, independence or other political solutions.
Amnesty International has also documented the use of unnecessary or excessive force and firearms as well as torture and other ill-treatment by the security forces against political activists and others suspected of links to pro-independence groups in both Papua and West Papua Provinces. Accountability for such acts is rare and, at most, security personnel only receive disciplinary, as opposed to criminal, sanctions.

Name: Agustinus Yolemal

9 Briefe verschickt  
My Urgent Actions
Fürs Mitzählen lassen Ihres Briefes und Update-Funktion zu nutzen müssen Sie sich
einloggen oder
anmelden
Downloads
UA 165/18 english
Microsoft Word Document, 28.9 kB
UA 165/18 deutsch
Microsoft Word Document, 30.3 kB
UA 165/18 français
Microsoft Word Document, 29.0 kB
Aktionsabfolge
Mehr zum Thema

Folter

Warum ist Folter immer falsch und nutzlos? Wie engagiert sich Amnesty für die Wahrung des absoluten Folterverbots? Mehr