Benutzerspezifische Werkzeuge
Amnesty Urgent Actions
Startseite Urgent Actions 2018 07 Lawyer jailed for defending women’s rights 38 years and 148 lashes for women’s rights defender
FI 126/18-2
Abgeschlossen am 13. Juni 2019
Mitteilung schliessen

11.4.19: Deadline extended

We are extending the appeal deadline for prominent Iranian human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh until 13 June 2019, as her case still requires a massive and global mobilization.



Signez aussi la pétition: Liberté pour Nasrin Sotoudeh

Unterschreiben Sie auch unsere Petition: Freiheit für Nasrin Sotoudeh

38 years and 148 lashes for women’s rights defender

AI-Index: MDE 13/0024/2019

Prominent Iranian human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh has been sentenced to 38 years in prison and 148 lashes after two grossly unfair trials. The charges against her stem solely from her peaceful human rights work, including defending women’s rights and her outspoken opposition to the death penalty.


Nasrin Sotoudeh was arrested at her home in Tehran on 13 June 2018 and taken to Evin prison, where she is being detained in the women’s ward. She has been denied access to her lawyer. The most recent charges against Nasrin Sotoudeh stem from her peaceful human rights work, including her defence of women who were prosecuted in 2018 for peacefully protesting the abusive, discriminatory and degrading forced hijab laws in Iran. In her indictment, the prosecution authorities listed seven charges against her, four of which were based on her opposition to forced hijab: «inciting corruption and prostitution»; «openly committing a sinful act by… appearing in public without a hijab»; «disrupting public order»; and «disturbing public opinion». Nasrin Sotoudeh’s peaceful human rights activities against forced hijab, including those undertaken in her role as a lawyer, such as meeting with her clients, have been used to build a criminal case against her. The other three charges against her – «forming a group with the purpose of disrupting national security», «spreading propaganda against the system» and «gathering and colluding to commit crimes against national security» – were also based on peaceful activities that the authorities have deemed as «criminal». These activities include belonging to human rights groups such as the Centre for Human Rights Defenders and the Campaign for Step by Step Abolition of the Death Penalty. Even Nasrin Sotoudeh’s insistence on choosing an independent lawyer instead of one from the list of 20 selected by the head of the judiciary has also been cited by the prosecution authorities as a criminal act. Her trial, which took place on 30 December 2018 before Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court in Tehran, was held in her absence. She had refused to attend her trial, citing the unjust nature of the proceedings.

In her court verdict, Article 134 of Iran’s Penal Code was applied, which allows judges to use their discretion to impose a higher sentence than the maximum statutory requirement when a defendant faces more than three charges. In Nasrin Sotoudeh’s case, the judge, Mohammad Moghiseh, applied the maximum statutory sentence for each of her seven charges and then added another four years to her total prison term, raising it from the statutory maximum of 29 to 33 years. On 11 March 2019, the Islamic Republic News Agency reported that judge Mohammad Moghiseh told journalists that Nasrin Sotoudeh has been sentenced to seven years in prison: five years for «gathering and colluding to commit crimes against national security» and two years for «insulting the Supreme Leader». He also said: «the verdict was not issued in her absence because she had a lawyer». On 13 March, Nasrin Sotoudeh’s husband said in a Facebook post that, during a prison visit with her family, she was angered that the judge had spread lies about her case. In response to the judge’s statement, she said that she had not been charged with «insulting the Supreme Leader» in either of her cases. She said that her trial had taken place in the absence of both her and her lawyer and that the verdict had also been issued in their absence. She also stated that she has not been allowed any access to her lawyer in her most recent case. As she has been convicted of multiple charges, each incurring a separate prison sentence, if her conviction and sentence are upheld by an appeal court, she will have to serve the single most lengthiest sentence.

In September 2016, Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court in Tehran tried Nasrin Sotoudeh on the charges of «spreading propaganda against the system» and «gathering and colluding to commit crimes against national security». On the day of her trial, she was denied entry to the courthouse and the hearing was held in her absence. She was not informed that she had been tried and convicted until after her most recent arrest. The court verdict made no mention of the aforementioned charges. Instead, the judge convicted her on the more contentious charge of «assisting in hiding spies with the intent to harm national security» under Article 510 of the penal code and sentenced her to five years in prison, two years more than the maximum statutory punishment for this offence. In her court verdict, the authorities accused her of working with «counter-revolutionaries» based inside and outside Iran to threaten national security, and of «holding secret meetings with foreign diplomats and people who were suspected of being intelligence officers based in foreign embassies in Tehran» under the «pretext» of human rights. It also stated that «she had been given €50,000 for the Sakharov Prize so that she could sustain her activities against national security and for the overthrow of the state». In 2012, while serving a previous prison sentence in Evin prison, Nasrin Sotoudeh was awarded the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, jointly with Iranian filmmaker Jafar Panahi, by the European Parliament. Amnesty International understands that she has never received a monetary award for the prize.

14 Briefe verschickt  
My Urgent Actions
Fürs Mitzählen lassen Ihres Briefes und Update-Funktion zu nutzen müssen Sie sich
einloggen oder
UA 126/18-2 english
Microsoft Word Document, 33.5 kB
UA 126/18-2 français
Microsoft Word Document, 33.0 kB
UA 126/18-2 deutsch
Microsoft Word Document, 32.9 kB
Mehr zum Thema


Warum ist Folter immer falsch und nutzlos? Wie engagiert sich Amnesty für die Wahrung des absoluten Folterverbots? Mehr


In welchen Ländern existiert die Todesstrafe noch immer? Wie viele Menschen werden jährlich weltweit hingerichtet? Mehr


Grundlegende Infos über die Menschenrechte und die verschiedenen internationalen Abkommen. Mehr